Opa1612 vs opa1656 forum

Opa1612 vs opa1656 forum. Dec 9, 2019 · Technically speaking, it's really hard to beat opamps like AD797, AD8599, OPA1612, OPA1656, so it might be safer to use one of these over the "exotic" ones, unless swapping opamps is really fun for you and you have enough money to spend on this hobby. Compare the datasheets. Is the OPA1656 the correct opamp to use? I heard it was the best so that’s why I picked it. 1 kOhm - 1 MOhm 4). 5 V to 36 V) on 3. 7 of OPA1612 datasheet) Apr 6, 2020 · The OPA2134 is very ordinary, I consider it a side step to the NE5532. The FET-input architecture achieves a low 2. As per datasheet Fig 7, OPA1656 achieves this pretty well with loads of 2k (or more) @ output voltage 3V(rms) OPA1612 achieves this flatness of THD+N curve , eg in inverting mode G=-1 (Fig. Regarding the tone stack, if there is enough gain in the front-end, the input-referred noise may not be impacted by the resistances. The OPA1655 and OPA1656 (OPA165x) are Burr-Brown™ op amps designed specifically for audio and industrial applications, where maintaining signal fidelity is crucial. OPA1656 opa1655 , opa1656 SBOS901C – MARCH 2019 – REVISED SEPTEMBER 2022 An IMPORTANT NOTICE at the end of this data sheet addresses availability, warranty, changes, use in safety-critical applications, Mar 17, 2019 · I purchased 10 OPA1656's. The diyaudio forum might be better suited for posing the question. Transients are stronger, both rimshots of snare drum and big-band trumpets. 1F X7R on the backside with the shortest possible lead length. In note slyt630. Opa1656 has good phase response at high frequency. Tested a lot of OP, including LME49720, OPA1612, OPA1642, MUSES8920 and MUSES8820. I had no oscillations or instability with the OPA1656. 9mA of supply current. I’m going to solder the IC to a soic to dip adapter then plug it into the the amp. 6 fa/rtHz broadband current noise. 4nV/rtHz both flat. Close to zero DC mv at its output would enable removal of the dreaded electrolytic coupling caps which will definitely lower colouration and improve sound quality. Aug 3, 2024 · Forum Donor. 4 Calculating Voltage Noise at the Output. Mar 17, 2019 · Benefit is lower dc offset and less distortion also high open loop gain also superior stability. The OPA 627 is well over price and is bass heavy and it’s not worth the price you pay for it The OPA1612 and OPA827 are much better than any of these but these are SOIC and you’ll need an adapter with experience soldering skills. If a transient causes the op amp inputs to be pulled apart, the differential input voltage forward-biases those diodes causing a large input bias current. The OPA1611 and OPA1612 offer rail-to-rail output swing to within 600 mV with a 2-kΩ load, which increases headroom and maximizes dynamic range. You retrieve so much details and trebble extension but could be a bit fatiguing. but the difference between opa2604 and LME49720 is much smaller than the difference between these two compared to the original ne5532. I am planning to replace the NE5532 in my Burson Funk with the OPA1656. Below, I have highlighted the components that could be adjusted if this the issue. I looked at the Slew Rate as my main Mar 22, 2022 · OPA1612 (soic on dil adapter board), bi-polar from input to output, again a very good opamp, which to me "sounds more balanced" top to bottom than the LME, it is just as dynamic, but just a little less obvious in the bass leading edge because the mid-range seems a little more fleshed out rich and full bodied, highs are just as good as the LME. Mar 17, 2019 · A quick snapshot of the OPA1656 performance specs: 2. 4 nV/rthz. Mar 17, 2019 · OPA1656 rolling I tried in all cases to bypass the rails with a 0. 5Vrms signal, 80-kHz measurement bandwidth. Does anybody Jul 5, 2006 · SQ was about the same as other ESS-based dacs in that class. pdf (sorry, pasting the address makes a huge link) you use a ~50 ohm isolation resistor. Are there any other We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Jul 3, 2019 · Forum Donor. Mar 17, 2019 · The OPA1641 would be slightly better. Two cases were evalutated – in a opa1655 , opa1656 SBOS901C – MARCH 2019 – REVISED SEPTEMBER 2022 An IMPORTANT NOTICE at the end of this data sheet addresses availability, warranty, changes, use in safety-critical applications, Jun 5, 2023 · After working with some OPA1612 on my recent Topping PA5 D01 Module replacement project (at ASR), a friend sent me a few OPA1612 opamps he ordered when they were in stock since i couldnt get them anywhere. Transparency got way better. Aug 3, 2024 #201 Buckeye Amps said: Sticking with the OPA1656. Both (I believe have Fet-inputs) There’s also 2189 CMOS audio op amp has impressive specs of an impressive was designed for MUX friendly DACs and multichannel dacs! Mar 17, 2019 · The Vendor's Bazaar forum is for commercial offers and transactions. Aol Products Precision op amps (Vos<1mV) INA1620 — High-fidelity audio operational amplifier with integrated thin-film resistors and EMI filtering OPA130 — Single, 1-MHz, 20-pA bias current, 530-µA power, FET operational amplifier OPA131 — Single, 4-MHz, 50-pA bias current, 750-µA power, FET operational amplifier OPA140 — Single-channel, 11-MHz, low-noise 36-V JFET precision operational Mar 17, 2019 · The OPA1641 would be slightly better. I did an A/B comparison to LME47920 (metal cans), burson V5i, V6 and also the Sparkos Pro discrete op-amps on one of my DAC's. I prefered the sound of my DAC with the OPA1656's hands down even over the discrete op-amps. (or the 2156) The opamp has good phase margin and seems quite tolerant of sub-optimal layout. Mar 17, 2019 · Here is a copy paste of the result for OPA1656 OPA1656 In the past I have to say I prefered widely the AD precise sound vs the softer traditional TI sound. FYI I'm about to order an Audiophonics HPA-S400ET with OPA1612 instead of With that being said, there will not be a huge noise performance difference between OPA1656 (~4nV/rthz) vs OPA1678 (~5nV/rthz) when the thermal noise is already 11. Jan 27, 2024 · The OPA1612 has lower noise and distortion than OPA1656. 10 kOhm - 10 MOhm Set 1 produces no visual deviation at all. If you have guitar related questions, start with the "search" field at the top of the page. Mar 9, 2023 · SMSL SU-10 vs M500 MKIII vs DO300 21 vs 9 vs 11 dual op-amps OPA1612 (accoring to the spec from smsl-audio) What is the Op-amps doing in that? M500 SINAD is higher than DO300 with less op-amps. The different players sounded different. IMHO the outcome was mostly decided by how the opamps responded to the RF coming out of the dac chip. Mar 21, 2023 · The trade off would be noise vs stability. OPA1612 sounds better than any transistor preamp I've ever heard and better then my own 6N6P 2 case -no barrels hold- 36kg monster preamp with a 100% double blind test win rate. He does test the TL072 against some more modern ones, but not the OPA1612 due to there being no DIP version I think. OPA1656 1/2 OPA1656 Input Output Pad Product Folder Order Now Technical Documents Tools & Software Support & Community An IMPORTANT NOTICE at the end of this data sheet addresses availability, warranty, changes, use in safety-critical applications, intellectual property matters and other important disclaimers. 1-nV/√ Hz noise density with an ultralow distortion of 0. It appears that the OPA1611/2 have a lower noise voltage, wider bandwidth and higher slew rate than the OPA134 and OPA2134's. I've had the Burson V5i, and the V6vivid and I have no space to put a sparkos labs opamp single or dual channel. You can dig on the Internet and find modern op-amp test results, but it quickly crosses over into sonic character and subjective opinion. Dynamics felt better, bass felt more defined and the upper midrange seems to have more air. It could be very interesting to test their performance: - SNR - Bandwish - slew rate-. Mar 17, 2019 · OPA1656 is less noisy than the OPA827, 2. CMRR is not a big issue. Dec 10, 2021 · This is my first time doing anything DIY with audio. 7 pA/rthz) will multiply with the pickup resistance (varies quite a bit, say typical is 10 kOhm) to become the Dec 6, 2018 · I don't think you can "get into it" here, it quickly degrades to psychoacoustics and audiophoolery compared to science. Feb 11, 2021 · I'll look at it if you know of one amp using OPA1612 sounding audibly better than another amp using cheaper op amp in objective listening comparison. 000015% at 1 kHz. Sep 14, 2021 · This leads me to believe there could be an issue caused by the back-to-back diodes across the inputs of bipolar (LME49990, OPA1612) and CMOS op amps (OPA1656). I see, thanks for the information. OPA627 is really bass forward but you lose details, clarity and energy. The op amp offers a temperature range of -40°C to +125°C and is available in an 8-pin SOIC package. Several reference are used on forum. I felt a great improvement overall. ••• Sep 6, 2023 · I was using opa1656 with fosi v3 ever since I got the uni. . The Vendor's Bazaar forum is for commercial offers and transactions. BTW, last year I crippled my €4. OPA1656 sounded worst, Muses 8920 sounded best. Now, we run through a hand calculation to find the total noise of a simplified audio Jul 4, 2009 · Here’s a great article comparing opa2156 CMO vs opa1612. 3V inside of each supply. Best Regards, Chris Featherstone. Now they seems to have changed again to opa1612 in many places - maybe a suggestion to try ? I have tried ne5532, opa2604, lm4562 and opa1612 and I prefered LM 4562 in both Aiyima a07 and the tpa3251-based Aiyima a04. It's best use as an alternative to opa1612 when noise is not a big concern. I used though the better TIs in output stages of middle class DACs as these benefitted from a more round /warm presentation with less details, as that masked their weaknesses and in fact Sep 27, 2019 · The OPA1656 operates over an ultra-wide supply range of ±2. 000 (DIY!) tube preamp with tube Sep 25, 2019 · The OPA165x operates over a very wide supply range of ±2. Currently, I require opamps in the DIP package. Joined Feb 24, 2016 Messages 10,260 Likes 16,337 Location uk, taunton. 9nV/rtHz vs. Dec 11, 2019 · The OPA1656 immediately raised my attention, plus there was/is a long thread about it on diyaudio. 9 mA of supply current to accommodate the power supply constraints of many types of audio products. Nov 30, 2021 · Stability should be considered especially with the wider bandwidth of the OPA1656. Now, we run through a hand calculation to find the total noise of a simplified audio Apr 8, 2021 · So there is a huge possibility of combinations) But I found my happiness as follows: - 5 X OPA1612 (Bi polar OP amps work generally well with DACs) - 2 X OPA1656 (They are CMOS op amps but I really love their signature, very natural with a flat response and great soundstage). i expected them to put some 1 10 100 1000 1 10 100 1k 10k 100k 1M 10M 9ROWDJH1RLVH6SHFWUDO'HQVLW\ Q9 ¥+] Frequency (Hz) C006 Product Folder Sample & Buy Technical Documents Tools & Software The OPA1611 (single) and OPA1612 (dual) bipolar-input operational amplifiers achieve very low 1. Mar 17, 2019 · We tried OPA1612, OPA1656, NE5532, and Muses 8920 opamps in Rohm BD34301EKV Evaluation Board (which came with 5532's installed). The OPA1656 is the industry’s lowest voltage noise high voltage CMOS on the market. 5 MHz LM4562, 55 MHz OPA2134, 8 MHz A 1 metre cable with polyethylene dielectric has its first resonance at 50 MHz, a 1. PRODUCTION DATA. Dec 30, 2023 · Part Number: OPA1612 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA1656 I'm up to, to design a 3rd or 4th order 20 Hz high pass filter with ultra low distortion. May 19, 2017 · maybe modern production 3886 are all above average? the designs seem to take the 'typical' GBW spec as the effective minimum My guesstimate puts the safe with production variation margin local closed loop gain corner as low as 100kHz for LM3886 with a greater than 4:1 range designing for stable extra loop gain from the nice input op amp really doesn't give much 20 kHz added safe composite loop The OPA1655 and OPA1656 (OPA165x) are Burr-Brown™ op amps designed specifically for audio and industrial applications, where maintaining signal fidelity is crucial. OPA1612 is a great amplifier, however, it is bipolar (input type) and when used immediately at the front-end of a guitar input, the input current noise (1. 10 Ohm - 10 kOhm, 2). alongside with some aliexpress el`cheapos for like 2 buck a piece instead of 7. I repeated measurements a few times, using sets of resistors: 1). Some people have more recently started using OPA1656, which are very good, although they are a little less authoritative in the bass. 53 MHz gain bandwidth product, 24V/us slew rate. Nov 26, 2017 · thanks for your tips! i have tested the opa2604 and the LME49720 compared to the ne5532. It's a killer OpAmp, and better suited to non-inverting buffer duties than the OPA1612/2211. 6 mA but I know I’m in the Op amp thread so I don’t want to take the thread off topic. The output swing for Aol should be considered as it is different between the two devices. (OPA1612 vs OPA1656) before production May 15, 2022 · Buggle2 Riaa board. 9‑nV/√ Hz voltage noise density and 6‑fA/√ Hz current noise density, allowing for very-low noise performance in a wide variety Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA1612, OPA1642, RC4136 I use these amplifiers for pro audio. He gives strong recommendations for some applications and also caveats about ill-informed op amp rolling. In the meantime we will wait for the customers feedback on the component values in order to check the stability of each op amp below using the OPA1656. Tried putting in opa1612 today. This feature accommodates the power supply constraints of many types of audio products. I suggest the following reference - 994Enh Discret OpAmp SONIC IMAGERY LABS - SPARKOS LABS SS3606 - AOP 1612 - LM4562 Sep 14, 2021 · The LM4562 is an exception, but otherwise it are the fast op-amps that JRA has trouble with: Misbehaving: OPA1656, gain-bandwidth product 53 MHz LME49990, 110 MHz OPA1612, 40 MHz Behaving well: OPA2604, 20 MHz OPA627, 16 MHz OPA2107, 4. 8. 9 v/µSec for a OPA1656 at isn't really that expensive for opa1656, opa1602, opa1612. Standard opamp for that has pretty much become OPA1612. 3 MHz. I don't care about listening tests or something else, just want to use the technical better one in my amp. Jan 28, 2018 · I had the chance to gather up a selection of opamps from my parts bin, including BB OPA2604, OPA637, AD823, LME49860, JR4556, Muses8820 and 8920, and compare them against each other along with a Burson V6 Classic (thanks to them for sending me an evaluation). I think it's a matter of circuit design and implementation. My main attraction to them is a higher ripple current in the AC to “ power” the board onward as the opa1612 only requires low quiescent current of 3. 5 metre cable at 33. Since I am not interested in the V6 Vivid Dual that it comes with. the differences aren't huge, but big enough to make a change worthwhile. May 10, 2022 · You don't have to use SA, distortion level obvious on oscilloscope screen. It offers exceptional performance in almost any audio application. MUSES8820 is the best, IMHO. 9‑nV/√ Hz voltage noise density and 6‑fA/√ Hz current noise density, allowing for very-low noise performance in a wide variety Welcome to r/guitar, a community devoted to the exchange of guitar related information. Dear all, aiming to keep THD+N figures constant over the audio frequency range. OPA1612 is very Part Number: OPA1612 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA1622, OPA1688 Hello, I am considering the OPA1612 as a headphone driver replacement for JRC2114. For example, Aol for the OPA1656 with a 600 ohm load will have a linear output swing that is 1. Composite amplifier is one of the best application with opa1656. Apr 8, 2021 · I tried OPA1622, OPA627 and OPA1612 at I/V stage and OPA1612 is clearly the best to my ears. 8 bucks for a genuine part. Total Noise of OPA1656 vs OPA1612. com with a TI insider involved. The low voltage noise combined with the low current noise make this device great for low and high impedance applications such as a high gain microphone pre-amplifier. -131 dB THD+N at 1kHz, 600 ohm load, 3. My understand if noise isn’t a problem the opa1656 is great alternative to the opa1612. May 23, 2018 · Opa1656 and opa1612 without tweaking have better performance than almost any discrete solution. The OPA827 for example has superior load drive,much lower distortion and miniscule DC offset. Hi Ervin, Yes those devices are very popular, unfortunately I don't have any way to know for sure when they are back in stock. 5). the ne5532 looks a bit harder, narrower and more direct, the other two a bit more relaxed and Total Noise of OPA1656 vs OPA1612. When we developed the OPA1656, this was also a major design target for us, and the designer and myself spent quite awhile in the lab with previous CMOS audio op amps (specifically OPA1652 and OPA1688) hunting for sources of input capacitance variation. Feb 28, 2021 · The new breed of TI J-Fet opamps offer superior performance to that old soldier the OPA2134. OPA1612 is fuller sounding - especially lower midrange but also more dynamic. Jan 10, 2016 · He talked to me about OPA1611's versus OPA134's as well as the OPA1612's versus OPA2134's. >100mA output current. Jul 4, 2021 · The article linked below isn't the be-all and end-all on op amps tests, but very informative. NE5532 is a very good amplifier especially for the price ($0. 9nV/rtHz broadband voltage noise. 25V to ±18V or (4. Mar 14, 2010 · Tubey, better late than never - I just replaced all NE5532 amps in Benchmark DAC1 with OPA1612 and play it so far for few hours. I'm waiting for OPA1656 and ADA4896 to try at I/V stage. I read on several forum the advantage to use specific AOP for the final stage of DAC or Amplifier. It's a virtually unknown chip as when you search on Digi-Key it doesn't come up as soundplus. This is a forum where guitarists, from novice to experienced, can explore the world of guitar through a variety of media and discussion. Soundstage and placement felt more solid. Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA1612, OPA828. 25 V to ±18 V (4. 5V to 36V) on 3. It could sound pretty good, but one could get sound just as good from IC opamp designs. Apr 10, 2019 · I have interested in low ESR Electrolytic Capacitors to power the Opa1612. But I would still like to see the OPA1656 tested. But that does not say anything about the SQ. It has the most stable input capacitance vs. I used 10 or 12 in my preamp rolling project - never a problem with Feb 11, 2021 · As Mark pointed out OPA1612 is a terrific sounding opamp and if you have problems with its bold mighty extreme low bass performance or with the extreme high resolution and unfiltered highs you can use other new opamps with a more gentle sound like OPA2209, OPA2189 etc. 100 Ohm - 100 kOhm, 3). Dual customzied solution will give unmeasurable distortion (possibly -180db). The Texas Instruments OPA1656 has a specified temperature range from –40°C to +125°C and is offered in an 8-pin SOIC package. common mode voltage that I've measured on any op amp. This is just a theory. I also refurbish large format recording consoles. May 9, 2023 · Which of the two mentioned OP Amps (OPA1612 or OPA1656) is the better one, in a scientific point of view. Dec 28, 2018 · I would like to see the OPA1656, a burr brown sound plus chip. Joined Dec 21, 2020 Messages 1,924 Likes 2,847. So you'd be "degrading" the performance by going that route (even though both are excellent). Feb 11, 2021 · According to the TI datasheets OPA1612 has less noise than OPA1656. ripyfd whnic leri ywea ovbhp juhmjdnf ujxget imbzx mortml igjkzmx